What the researcher assumed
Checked against: mixing time per addition
Not supportedCompared across 15 recorded variables, judged against 5 reference runs.
Method B used 38% less base than Method A
Outside normal variation (±1 mL). The difference is real; the question is why.
Checked against: mixing time per addition
Not supportedMethod B used 38% less base than Method A, but water source also differed (tap vs distilled) and the assumed cause (mixing time per addition) is contradicted.
Water source differed: tap vs distilled
Ranked by how far outside normal variation they fall. Open a row to see both runs’ evidence.
6 claims, every one citing evidence. 2 rejected by the validator. No probabilities are used.